Thursday, September 01, 2005

What in the Wide Wide World of Sports...

So let me explain this business about a "Companion Blog".

No, there is too much. Let me sum up.

It starts a long, long time ago, in an institute of higher learning right down the road from here called Emory University. I arrived there in 1988 as a stupid, self-righteous, highly egotistical shithead. I cannot stress this point to you enough - I had no idea what I was doing, who I was, or what I wanted from life. What I did have, in spades, was an excess of self-confidence about how fucking smart I was. Sometimes, that self-confidence was all that kept me going. Luckily for me, I started meeting people who were actually every bit as smart as I thought I was. They thought the way I thought, they talked the way I talked, they read as much as I did and more, and they were a lot funnier than I was, and I would have told you back then that I was pretty fucking funny. These people taught me that I really was as smart as I thought I was, and that I could be that way and drop the excessive bullshit around it; that self-belief did not have to mutually exclude belief in others.

I'm a stubborn man, but I like to think I learned this lesson well.

One of these very bright, very funny, terribly erudite people was Megan. If for no other reason, Megan would win top awards for introducing me to one Wanda Yang, now Wanda Yang Temko, my greatest, bestest friend and co-author of this here blog. But wait, there's more.

  • Late night rehearsals of James Taylor's 3-part arrangement of "That Lonesome Road" in the atrium of the DUC.
  • Encouragement while arranging "This Island Earth" for the now defunct (in fact, for the almost immediately defunct) A-Capella group we attempted to form, and for letting me believe that it was only 4 parts, and not 5, as it clearly is.
  • Introduction to more authors than I knew existed.
  • Always willing to listen.

She and I were good friends during our Emory days, but, as will happen with all human relationships there was ebb and flow in the amount of time and attention we had. Besides which, once Wanda and I were properly aligned, I had very little time I wished to spend anywhere else at all. It also should be noted that Wanda and Megan were much better friends with eachother than Wanda and I were friends with one another. In fact, you could almost say that Wanda, well... Wanda wished I would drop dead.

But that's a story for another time.

Over the years, the collective Yang Temkos and Megan were out of touch entirely with one another(s?). It wasn't until we returned from our exile in Bloomington that we finally reconnected with her, which was a delightful experience for us all. It seems that, in the intervening space, we'd all become pretty fucking interesting froods (and nobody had farther to go than I did, so this is a signifigant achievement), but more to the point the connection we all had each to the other was still strong, and meaningful, and worth building upon. Friends like Megan don't come around every dynasty.

Well, now Megan is experiencing an exile of her own. She might not have chosen hers in the same way that we chose ours, but I do not believe it is a stretch to suggest that Megan thinks of Atlanta as home. And rather than falling out of touch with her again, as would be relatively easy to do even in this golden age of communication, we have all agreed to stay in touch as thoroughly as possible, to keep a feeling of anchoring for her here should she ever find a way to come back.

Now, I have resisted the blogging trend for a long time, despite its obvious application to my occasional need to rant, or to relate an amusing anecdote about something that happened, or even just to make some shit up. But, as I alluded to in an earlier post, some things are becoming manifestly clear to me as I age.

  1. Computers are a young man's game. The constant drive to keep up with every facet of available technology requires an enormous expenditure of energy. At this time in my life I can easily keep up; I even enjoy keeping up.
  2. This cannot possibly remain the case indefinitely.

Given this, it seems obvious that I ought to start developing other skills I can use to make a living, skills that don't require me to spin my wheels quite so fast in order to keep up. I have always loved to write, and sometimes I even write well. Unfortunately, I seem to have had trouble focusing for any length of time on any length of writing. I have two stories in my head currently. One of them is a short story, the other is epic in scope, and as much as I love it, I'm not ready to write it yet, not by a long shot. As it happens, my good friend Megan is a dramaturg of signifigant accomplishment (if you want to know what that means, I suggest you ask her) so now the path seems abundantly clear.

Enter the Companion Blog.

We kill so many birds with one stone it's a wonder the Audubon Society hasn't sent us a cease and desist. We all get to keep in touch. Megan has a forum in which to keep friends and family up to date (which I, as the official geek-in-residence to all of my friends, am all too happy to manage on her behalf), and as an extra bit of fun, Megan and I will occasionally give one another writing assignments to do, riffing on a theme of a post on one of our blogs, or maybe just making something up because it's interesting. Along with the posting on topics with which we are both comfortable with, it is my hope that we can take one another out or our respective comfort zones, enough to keep the experience organic, alive, human. It seems clear to me that I am getting more out of this deal than she is, but as long as she's willing to go along with it, I'm a fool not to take her up on it.

Blog On, Wanda!
Blog On, Megan!
(er... on Dancer and Vixen!)

Sunday, August 28, 2005

Benjamin vs. BMV

The following story has been slightly edited from its original appearance in the Chronicles in order to clear up some of the nested parentheticals of which I was so fond in the late 90’s. It was first published on Monday, January 5th, 1998, and what I’ve always loved about this story is the fact that the clerks at the DMV were the ones who told me, quite incorrectly, what the BMV meant in the first place. This was the first in a long line of lessons geared towards teaching me that nobody from Indiana is to be trusted.

I would like to make this story a link from a smaller post, but I cannot figure out how this might be accomplished at this time, so here it is in its entirety. I will post Remote Control Terrorism under separate cover tomorrow, along with an explanation of the meaning of Companion Blog.


I normally tend to believe that stereotypes, perhaps even most stereotypes, are unjustified, based in fear and misunderstanding.

On the other hand, there's Indiana.

Today's adventure involved getting a new driver's license and changing the title of the car. Indiana law states that within 60 days of your establishing full time residency (defined as a period of continuous and primary residency within the state borders of 180 days, or that point in time during which more than 50% of your total income is derived from in-state funds - who the hell writes these laws?) you must have your tags and title transferred to Indiana State tags and titles. So, I go to the BMV (not, for whatever reason, the DMV, or Department of Motor Vehicles, but the BMV, which doesn’t even mean Bloomington Motor Vehicles, but rather the Bureau of Motorized Visitation, as if it were some sort of holy or celestial event) to get all of this done. Well, in order to get my GA State license transmogrified to an Indiana driver's license I have to take, *gasp*, a test.

The Indiana driver’s licensing test is a unique experience. I can't even begin to make a guess as to when the testing system was designed - perhaps something in the mesozoic era. You stand at a booth and sit through the equivalent of a slide show. There's a video screen set into a desk, and what sounds suspiciously like a slide projector underneath it projects a picture with a question on it onto your screen. You have three buttons to push to indicate your response (and not anything so cool as touch-sensitive buttons on the screen itself, nosir, these are the kinds of buttons you find only on really old elevators in your grandmother's condominium - big black knobby monstrosities which you have to push in about 2 inches before they register, and when they register it’s even odds as to your getting the shit shocked out of you) and a button to push (same kind) to signify that you pushed one of the other buttons and meant it.

Why the second button, I asked?

Because, they told me patiently, in case you changed your mind.

There're only three, I pointed out, how much room for error do I really need here?

Well, I was informed, some folks don't do very well and we like to give 'em the benefit of the doubt.

Anyway, should you get one of the questions wrong, the machine emits a loud thumping sound, the entire thing shakes, and the bottom part of the screen falls away (literally - I think this is what the thumping noise is - the bottom part of your screen hitting the ground - they must raise it back up again with a piece of twine or something) to reveal the correct answer. As it turns out, I got two out of 20 wrong – enough to pass the test.

The first one I got wrong was, "What is a safe distance to follow another
vehicle?" My choices were :

a) 1 second behind the leading vehicle
b) 2 seconds behind the leading vehicle
c) 100 feet behind the leading vehicle

Well, since this was a subjective question, not a law question, I figured I couldn't get it wrong so I pushed c) , since it was the only actual distance listed in my three choices, the other two being lengths of time and not at all relevant to the question. Turns out that their answer is: b) two seconds. After the test I pointed out that :

  1. the quesiton was a matter of opinion and not, therefore, a proper question for a driving LAW test,

  2. there's no mention of conditions of the road or the speed I'm driving, all of which are factors, and 2 seconds can't possibly cover the entire spectrum of possibilities, even if it were a distance, and

  3. the question asked for a distance, not an amount of time and therefore the only right answer had to be the only distance listed

"Uh-Uhn," the clerk lady type said, "then why is the distance between stars and stuff called a light-year?"

Hiding my amazement that she had ever heard of a light-year in the first place, I explained the concept to her and then asked for a calculator so I could show her exactly how many feet a light-year was. That was when she lost interest in the topic and got a little miffed. They promised to make note of my objections. I decided not to tell them that I come from a big city where, no matter the conditions, you follow less than 1 car-length from the guy in front of you so some other asshole can't cut you off.

The other one I missed related to an Indiana driving law that specifies (in actual feet, not in seconds) exactly how far ahead of your turn you must turn on your indicator. They've made this a law. My choices were :

a) 50 feet
b) 100 feet, or 200 feet for faster driving, such as freeway or speedway
c) whenever

You think I'm making this up. I'm telling you the truth.

My answer was 50 feet. I figured since they had probably put so much detail into the b) thing that was probably right, but since it was my last question, and I had only missed the other one about the following distance, I went with a) 'cause that's generous for most Atlanta drivers, who go with c) most of the time themselves, if they turn them on at all.

Other questions on the Indiana Driver's License Test:

(picture of a "Do Not Enter" sign, which, in case you haven't seen one
lately, says in big red letters "DO NOT ENTER" on it)

This sign means :

a) Do Not Enter
b) Yield
c) You may safely ignore this sign


Not to be outdone:



(picture of a speed limit 40 sign)

When you see this sign you may travel :

a) 45 miles an hour
b) 40 miles an hour
c) out of state drivers do not have to obey speed limit signs

(you haven't any idea the desire I had to push "c", hoping against hope
it would be true)


Lastly:


(picture from the rear of a car passing another car, halfway between the two lanes & straddling the center line, which, coincidentally, is solid on his side, also with the wrong turn signal on)

The solid line on your side of the lane means:

a) You may pass at will
b) Do not pass
c) You are on the wrong side of the road

I burst out laughing at both this one and the Do Not Enter one, prompting a few disgruntled looks from the visitation clerks in my direction - in my mind I kept picturing some poor guy leaning out of his window and yelling out at the cars passing by him going the other way "You're on the wrong side of the roadja damn fool!!"


As a postscript, there are two errata which I am compelled to report:

  1. The place actually is the DMV. I read the sign wrong as I first walked in and thought of it wrongly the rest of my days in Indiana.
  2. When I asked the clerk when I first walked in about why the place was called the BMV and not the DMV I was not corrected, but was instead given the above explanation of Visitation as opposed to Bureau (I guess I asked the question convincingly enough that the clerk assumed I was, in fact, correct), and to this day I am loathe to admit that this is not its actual name.